Picking the right lens

作者: Steve Donaldson

使用者資料 Steve Donaldson 帳戶資料 >>
國家: United States
再多: facebook www

I am sure we have all searched for reviews and videos of different lenses we are interested in getting for our DLSR. It is amazing how many different opinions there are about the same lens. Some bad, some great and some swear by it. It almost makes it worst to read all the reviews because now you become even more confused and uncertain which to buy. In my expierence I went through all of that myself.  So what i decided to do is purchase each lens and try them out in the same situations, lighting, conditionsetc. I analyised all the shoots in Lightroom 3 and made my decision from there. I must say even though the off brand lens create amazing images, sometimes I had issues with focus speed, hunting and blur. With that said I decided to go with all 尼康 lenses. Mainly for resale value and just the certainity of getting my shots. The lens I tested where the 騰龍 17-50mm f/2.8 vs the 尼康 17-55 f/2.8. 尼康 beat the 騰龍 in focus speed. focus noise, hunting factor and lack of softness. Image quality was great on both though. I also tested the 騰龍 70-200 f/2.8. Again, great image quality. But in low light this lens was so slow to focus and hunted for focus alot. Even at higher shutter speeds it still did the same thing. Focus is noisy which is no big deal. But its all about focus accuracy to me. I went with the 尼康 70-200 vr.  Hope this helps.

使用者評估 + 個人意見

平均評估: 2.65  投票數: 20  你的評估:

12-12-2012 14:52 Manu Vilachan

使用者資料 Manu Vilachan 帳戶資料 >>
國家: Spain
再多: flickr facebook

Hi Steve! Very interesting your opinion about the resale value of the 尼康 lenses . But I'm thinking that you should also compare the 尼康 17-55 f2.8 with the 西格瑪 17-50 f2.8. Some people put the sigma slightly lower than 尼康's but very above over the 騰龍. Even the price of the 西格瑪 it's higher than the 騰龍. Personally I've got the 西格瑪 and images have a superior quality. I love it. As I mention good article. Regards.

要留下意見，你必須先 登入。